mvourlakos added a comment.
In D25807#581178 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D25807#581178>, @trmdi wrote: > In D25807#581161 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D25807#581161>, @mvourlakos wrote: > > > In D25807#581126 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D25807#581126>, @trmdi wrote: > > > > > @mvourlakos > > > Latte can guard that the order of screens within Latte is synced with plasmashell right? Because I see this: https://github.com/KDE/latte-dock/blob/master/app/screenpool.cpp > > > > > > why the screens order is relevant in this patch? the external application isnt just using the screen name? > > > Because I don't know which one latte could use for setting the availablescreenrect. Currently I use id, but David said that the id might be not synced between processes. > So you mean I should use screen name instead? The screen names are the same within latte vs plasmashell right? Even though Latte understands the plasma screen ids and can use them, I dont think the external apps should have that burden. The screenName is enough from my understanding. REPOSITORY R120 Plasma Workspace REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D25807 To: trmdi, #plasma, mvourlakos, davidedmundson, mart, apol Cc: davidre, plasma-devel, LeGast00n, The-Feren-OS-Dev, jraleigh, zachus, fbampaloukas, GB_2, ragreen, ZrenBot, ngraham, alexeymin, himcesjf, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, ahiemstra, mart
