On Friday 02 April 2010, Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote: > (My ideas, be free to kick ;) > > Hi Christophe, now I'm able to understand most of what you've > proposed. Somehow, I don't like having just one state machine for the > whole MC, the main reason being that we're going to support > extensibility through custom plugins, so the MC can no longer assume > that it knows exactly how many states are present. > What I propose is not altering the libraries, but to have a state > machine for each component (component as in the containment, > controller applet etc). Though I don't have code to show that right > now (i'm writing a small Qt app to demo it), I'll try to explain a > sample working-
While i share the concern over extesibility (and wouldn't know how to do it with a single global state machine) how a state machine for each component would fix that? a part every plugin being a omplete set of new applets... Cheers, Marco Martin _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
