On March 31, 2010, Ivan Čukić wrote: > > can we get together on irc soon and do a once-over of this and then get > > it moved into kdereview? > > Ok, I'll try to be online tomorrow. If not, then the weekend?
sounds great; i'll be around :) > > if we work around subsystems because "they don't work well yet" then the > > odds they ever will work well goes down as there is less reason / > > motivation to get them working well. if those subsystems can't be made to > > work well, then we shouldn't have them in our stack. otherwise, the aim > > should be to make them work. > > I know, and I understand your point, but activities can't really be > considered to be an important motivator for nepomuk's development anyway. the important motivator for nepomuk is "applications using it". aka "relevance". > I have no problem with hard-dependence on nepomuk, but that was something > that was agreed upon due to request from kwin guys - we had a small > meeting consisted of John, Lubos, Chani, Martin and me. ok; understood. i disagree, but if that's the consensus, so be it :) > > it's that simple. please stop working around > > brokenness. > > I'm aware of your stance on temporary solutions and their tendencies to > become permanent. If I promise it will not, will you trust me? :) how can i say "no" when you look at me with those eyes? ;) -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
