On March 9, 2010, Chani wrote: > well yeah, but then when the screen is disconnected you can't get at the > containment(s) that were on it until you reconnect a screen. > or do you think that's just not important?
i can imagine use cases where it's important, but it's something we can address later easily enough. or maybe we could get it nearly "for free" when we get around to stashing containments that are associated with a screen that doesn't currently exist; we could show these other containments as part of the activity that can be switched between, perhaps via a popup or other "slide out" in the activity switcher. but yes, there is a lot of groundwork that needs to be done first before we get to this chasm-in-need-of-a-bridge and i don't see anything that would create a blocker to building that bridge when we need to. -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
