ngraham added a comment.
In D23270#514911 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D23270#514911>, @meven wrote: > > To further reduce the confusion, the battery's degradation lavel is relocated to the Battery section. > > I don't think that is necessary. > What is confusing in a degradation value in an energy section ? > It is clearly an energy degradation value. No, energy doesn't degrade, but a battery does. Degradation is a property of the physical battery itself, not its energy. > If we want to make things clearer we could name "Degradation" "Capacity degradation" for instance That could work. REPOSITORY R102 KInfoCenter BRANCH capacity-to-degradation (branched from master) REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D23270 To: ngraham, meven, broulik, #vdg, #plasma, filipf Cc: aspotashev, filipf, plasma-devel, LeGast00n, The-Feren-OS-Dev, jraleigh, fbampaloukas, GB_2, ragreen, Pitel, ZrenBot, himcesjf, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, mart
