Hello Roman, On dimanche 11 août 2019 23:52:55 CEST Roman Gilg wrote: > [1] https://www.conventionalcommits.org
I like the idea very much, the changelog does look a bit messy indeed. It would allow me to filter out all style, ci, and test changes, which are not interesting to the user of the frameworks. I'm missing a type for internal cleanups like porting away from deprecated methods or fixing a harmless compiler warning? OTOH "chore" isn't documented in the Angular convention so I don't know what it is. In any case, it sounds like we need to write down our own list of types, right? I would also like to keep the "Test Plan" field from phab even after we move to gitlab, it pushes people to write down how they actually tested the change. I think we should wait until after the switch to gitlab though, because it might have some influence on this. For instance with phab I tend to prefix the subject with the repo name so that on k-f-d we can see which framework it's about. But that looks a bit redundant in the git history of a given repo afterwards so if the emails from gitlab include the repo name automatically, we shouldn't do that in the git commit log itself. -- David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr Working on KDE Frameworks 5
