On February 14, 2010, Riccardo Iaconelli wrote: > I hope some of you see the validity of my point...
i'm sure some of us will. some of us will also realize that you've rehashed all the arguments in favour of it that have already been made in the past without a single additional piece of new information added, all while completely ignoring anything that was said against the feature. such repetition of argumentation is a great debating technique, and the obvious response is to repeat verbatim everything that has been said in response previously. we could do so indefinitely every N months for all X features we don't all agree on until the person who is the most willing to argue endlessly "wins". however, i have no interest in design by rhetorical gesture and as such, at this point, i simply do not care whether your points are valid or not. if you want to mare sure that something doesn't change, go at it in a way that sets a bad procedural precedent that would threaten the health of the project. this one feature is not worth turning plasma into a "rule by the most repetitive" project. -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
