> Well, all you're doing here is instead of dumping it in b and using b > later, you're explicitly defining it inline. This is fine, although if Yes, I'm simulating the syntax of the /script/ language from before.
> we decide to return references (the . way) instead of using the << It is not 'instead', the << operator would be the *same* as the add method (It would probably be implemented like that) - the << operator would have to return the reference as well, so that it could be chained like in the example. > operator, would we be able to group stuff in parentheses like you did? I think that we would - the compiler wouldn't mind (exept for the extra ; I've placed in the parentheses :) ) > Anyway, like Aaron says, this is 2nd priority so we have time to > decide. Well, once a new API is introduced into libplasma, it is stuck to be like that until KDE 5.0. _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
