On Thursday 14 May 2009, David Nolden wrote: > We can do a better calculation than the users bad one, and that's why we > should do it.
but our calculation will still be wrong. and that's a cardinal rule: the user is allowed to get it wrong. the computer can't without diminishing trust in the system. lower trust translates to lower enjoyment and less value placed in the system. > In the end, the user will calculate the remaining time anyway, but at least > with working drivers, our calculation will be a lot better. > > We shouldn't give disadvantage to the user just to make ourselves look > better. it's not about us looking better, it's about allowing the user trust the system. is there really 30 minutes of battery left? no. is it really 15% charged? yes. which one leads the user to trust that the system offers correct information and can therefore be trusted and even pay a bit less attention / be less mentally concerned about it? all the user will care about the 30 minutes is that they eventually learn it isn't really accurate and so they can't really trust the system. -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Software
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
