On Tuesday 07 April 2009 03:09:22 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Monday 06 April 2009, Petri Damstén wrote: > > On Monday 06 April 2009 18:27:35 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > > On Monday 06 April 2009, Petri Damstén wrote: > > > > - In weather station to accurately detect if it's night or day. > > > > > > would it make sense to add this to the time engine? > > > > Doesn't adding solar position calculation to time engine complicate it > > too much? > > depends on how it's done, of course. > > if the solar sources started with "Solar:" then it would be easy to sort > out which path to go, and if all the parsing was put into a helper class it > would keep the TimeEngine class itself quite clean. > > the question is whether this is "time" data or not. if it is time data, it > should go into the time engine. the user of a DataEngine should not really > have to care about where data comes from but just the kind of information > they are after. > > i'm quite fine with it being in a separate DataEngine, but was curious as > to whether this is "time" information or something conceptually different.
I'll add this to feature plan for 4.3. I think moon phase and position would be nice here too. Petri
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
