On Wednesday 01 April 2009, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Dario Freddi wrote: > > Hi Marco, > > > > Just my 2 cents here. > > > > If the uncompressed raw data works and it's not an unmaintainable beast, > > I'd go for it for the simple fact that having to > > compress->transmit->decompress could be not so handy and sounds more like > > a hack. If I got you right: decompress means back to raw data? If so, I'd > > really prefer the second approach. Adding png would be an useless layer > > of complexity, I think. > > agreed. it's guaranteed to be usable by everyone, even weirdos without png > support ;) , and looks faster. so +1 for that. to be really portable is enough as is now that assumes argb32 images or an overcomplication like galago? i am for leaving as is for now and switch to a galago like thing if for instance it will seem a real issue when submitted to freedesktop... > > for the 10 icons in my system tray right now, it would take ~25-30ms to > transfer them. that's approximately 40x faster than it currently takes just > one of the icons to show up in the tray right now. > > wow. > > > Oh, forgot to say: great work :) > > +1
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
