>> If developers are interested and there is no objections I could try to >> create patch during this or next weekend. I'm already using this code >> in my >> applet for nearly half of year and it doesn't make any problems. > > sure thing :) send it to the list or post it on reviewboard.kde.org > (though if > it doesn't apply cleanly, reviewboard will have problems with it; > probably > best to just send it to the list in this case)
I could try with reviewboard first, I could create patch using fresh checkout of lib to avoid problems. > yes, a default implementation would make sense here indeed. in fact, if > we > added a setTimeUpdateInterval(int ms) to ClockApplet, then it could be > replaced quite easily in most cases. it's really just the update > interval (and > how that's controlled/configured) that's the reason this is > reimplemented in > every clock. So I could create additional patch for this. It could also add four protected methods, for setting and getting values of interval and alignment. What do you think about this? _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
