Yes, I'd like that very much, as I'd like to sponsor it as the official C++
library for interacting with JOLIE during research meetings, the industry,
the JOLIE website and so on... ;)
We should discuss the API for that then. I'm willing to make some changes to
the API of metaservice-java if we do that in 2 or 3 months (JOLIE 1.0 will
enter RC after that, and metaservice-java will have its API frozen for some
time), provided that we don't completely overhaul it but i don't think
that'll be the case.

2009/1/28 Aaron J. Seigo <ase...@kde.org>

> On Wednesday 28 January 2009, Fabrizio Montesi wrote:
> > How does that look?
>
> quite sensible; if we keep it similar to the java classes as well then we
> can
> increase the amount of transferable knowledge betwee the systems :)
>
> --
> Aaron J. Seigo
> humru othro a kohnu se
> GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43
>
> KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Software
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Plasma-devel mailing list
> Plasma-devel@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
>
>
_______________________________________________
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

Reply via email to