On Saturday 11 October 2008, Chani wrote: > > why am i on the fence? it will be slightly less convenient as the user > > will now have to go to two diferent places to configure things that are > > reflected in the same place. that's one of those things about "usability" > > when applied via straight logic versus considering actual user goals and > > patterns. > > if I change the theme in plasma, does it change the screensaver widgets' > theme?
iirc, the plasma screensaver shell is started every time the screen saver activates .. so .. yes =) > what about if I change it in this hypothetical kcm? ditto. > > > 5) we must hide other activities that aren't usable as desktop activity > > > (having a panel as desktop activity is a so bad idea)... > > > > yes, this is something that we'll want to add to the .desktop files i > > think... > > yes. marco mentioned the formfactor, but that's not enough to tell: the > screensaver containment would not work as a desktop containment, even > though it is of type DesktopContainment... (I'm actually still unsure of > whether it should be a CustomContainment) yes, we can't just use what we have verbatim. we'll need some categories. multiple categories per containment should be fine Desktop Screensaver Panel ... ? -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Software
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
