On Friday 10 October 2008, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Friday 10 October 2008 03:22:35 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Thursday 09 October 2008, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > > think it'll destroy half the benefit that was gained from refactoring
> > > if rushed. ;)
> >
> > which half would that be?
> >
> > we have 5 weeks until feature freeze, then more time after that to
> > stabalize. there's a patch in this thread that gives access to the
> > applet's extender.
>
> Note that also, from my casual analysis, applet->containment() goes wrong,
> so only some applets actually work. (I still have to look further into
> this, but it might have to be taken into account as well.) The problem I
> saw was that having the systray "between" applet and containment makes
> access from applet to the containment impossible -- and some applets seem
> to need that.

yes; i knew that would happen (and why we don't support nesting containments 
either, btw =) .. i need to look into this and devise a solution if nobody 
else steps up.

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Software

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

Reply via email to