On Monday 22 September 2008, Jason Stubbs wrote: > Hmm.. Actually, asking the Task object for a widget of a certain > orientation should be enough. eg. task->widget(Qt::Horizontal)
or Plasma::Horizontal =) > > personally, i think it makes more sense to have each tray simply have > > it's own collection of Tasks and rely on the protocol to support > > multiplexing (e.g. in an IPC based protocol, each Task would draw off of > > the same information; in a plasmoid based protocol, each Task would draw > > off the same list of applets and perhaps even the same configuraton > > objects for them) .. support in the Protocol is required anyways to make > > this work, so just leave it up to the Protocol in the first place would > > be my thought. > > This is what the returned QGraphicsWidget subclass should do in my design. aah, ok.. makes sense then. > Also, what is the orientation when on the desktop? Planar. (two degrees of freedom) -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Trolltech
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
