> you're mixing levels of the taxonomy. all Plasmoids are Widgets, but not > all Widgets are Plasmoids. HTML/CSS can also be Widgets; Google Gadgets are > Widgets; MacOS X Dashboard Widgets are Widgets, too.
Not sure if I'm mixing it? ;-) I know that it is possible (or at least should be) to run google gadgets and mac os x widgets on Plasma. Put these are also just technical details. From the user's point of view this should be the same. So they just run a "plasmoid" or however you want to call it. Not matter if it's a native C++ plasmoid, a python script or a Mac OS X Widget that's wrapped to run on Plasma. But as far as I understood you between your lines you interpret it this way: Widget: every gadget you can add to the desktop (or to other containers) Plasmoid: the native C++ widgets Also the dialog says: "Add Widgets..." So it seems that this is the term to use, right?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
