> On 12/07/25 at 12:50 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>> On 2025-07-10 20:46:09 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> > Hi
>> > 
>> > On 10-07-2025 19:52, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>> 
>> I am not a ruby export, but none of the files seem to be ruby-version
>> specific extensions (.so). Should ruby-mimemagic install its files to
>> /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all instead of version-specific paths?

I indeed completely overlooked that. You're right that nothing is arch
specific in this package.

> The upstream packaging is a bit broken: it includes an 'ext' dir (that
> is normally used for arch-specific libs) but its use of it does not
> involve arch-specific libs.
>
> Fixing the upstream packaging could make this a arch:all package too.

I remove the mention of an extension in the gemspec file, and make the
package arch:all. This will fix what was a mysterious arch specific (and
thus version specific) path for the gemspec file without explicit
dependency on the librubx.y package. Polishing in progress.

The NMU would help with the symptoms but not the cure the package, so
let me cancel it.

Cédric

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers

Reply via email to