On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:09 PM Matt Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 10:03 AM raghuveer devulapalli > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > The AVX2 implementation of OVER and REVERSE OVER operator was > > found to be upto 2.2 times faster (depending on the array size) than > > the corresponding SSE2 version. The AVX2 and SSE2 were benchmarked > > on a Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6260U CPU @ 1.80GHz > > > > Moving the helper functions in pixman-sse2.c to pixman-sse2.h. The AVX2 > > implementation uses the SSE2 version for manipulating pixels that are not > > 32 byte aligned and hence, it made sense to separate the SSE2 helper > > functions into a separate file to be included in the AVX2 file rather > > than duplicate code. > > Let's please move the helpers into pixman-sse2.h in a separate commit > from the one that adds AVX2 code paths. > > We typically have more substantial benchmarks in the commit message.
I ran all of the cairo traces in the benchmarks directory and couldn't measure any difference. You'll have to describe your benchmarking. _______________________________________________ Pixman mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman
