On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 04:27:54PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Fri, 2018-05-11 at 11:26 +0300, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: > > > That's an excellent example, demonstrating why the pixman test > > suite exists in the first place and how it helps to ensure that > > the end users are much less likely to encounter problems if > > package maintainers are doing a proper job. > > This is fixed in current package git, for what it's worth. > > I'll push this patch (or rather Dan's version with a better commit > message), but I don't know if pixman has a maintainer at the moment.
The last maintainer stepped down a couple years back due to a job change[1]. A new one seems to be needed. > I'd like to see Marc's gradient patches get some review, though I > haven't had time for that yet. I would like to see this reviewed and landed as well. I don't know pixman internals or code requirements, but I did not see anything technically wrong with the patch and it's been tested by end users and verified it does what it says it should. Fwiw, I've worked with Marc on the Inkscape project for some time now (he's also on Inkscape's Board of Directors). He does good work and is reliable on following up on issues. I would definitely give a +1 for commit access for him on pixman. Bryce 1: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pixman/2016-May/004613.html _______________________________________________ Pixman mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman
