Doesn't this check for NaNs?

On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 8:22 PM, Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
wrote:

> With commit ed39992564b "Use pixman_transform_point_31_16() from
> pixman_transform_point()" we added some strange hunks.
>
> Namely: we copy the data from the internal storage to the user vector
> only to compare them immediately after.
>
> Cc: Siarhei Siamashka <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> Siarhei, what is the intent with the original commit ? Any ideas why
> things crash ?
>
> Seemingly this can be dropped/replaced with TRUE, yet it causes one of
> the tests () to segfault in the optimised SSE2 codepath -
> scaled_bilinear_scanline_sse2_8888_8888_SRC.
>
> BILINEAR_INTERPOLATE_ONE_PIXEL -> BILINEAR_INTERPOLATE_ONE_PIXEL_HELPER
>
> Regards,
> Emil
> ---
>
>  pixman/pixman-matrix.c | 8 ++------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/pixman/pixman-matrix.c b/pixman/pixman-matrix.c
> index 65b3d32..117015b 100644
> --- a/pixman/pixman-matrix.c
> +++ b/pixman/pixman-matrix.c
> @@ -393,9 +393,7 @@ pixman_transform_point_3d (const struct
> pixman_transform *transform,
>      vector->vector[1] = tmp.v[1];
>      vector->vector[2] = tmp.v[2];
>
> -    return vector->vector[0] == tmp.v[0] &&
> -           vector->vector[1] == tmp.v[1] &&
> -           vector->vector[2] == tmp.v[2];
> +    return TRUE;
>  }
>
>  PIXMAN_EXPORT pixman_bool_t
> @@ -414,9 +412,7 @@ pixman_transform_point (const struct pixman_transform
> *transform,
>      vector->vector[1] = tmp.v[1];
>      vector->vector[2] = tmp.v[2];
>
> -    return vector->vector[0] == tmp.v[0] &&
> -           vector->vector[1] == tmp.v[1] &&
> -           vector->vector[2] == tmp.v[2];
> +    return TRUE;
>  }
>
>  PIXMAN_EXPORT pixman_bool_t
> --
> 2.8.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pixman mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman
>
_______________________________________________
Pixman mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman

Reply via email to