On Thu, 14 May 2015 00:27:36 +0100 "Ben Avison" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 08 May 2015 13:45:37 +0100, Pekka Paalanen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > + ok &= test_image_faults (PIXMAN_a8r8g8b8, 7, 5); > > + ok &= test_image_faults (PIXMAN_r8g8b8, 7, 5); > > + ok &= test_image_faults (PIXMAN_r5g6b5, 7, 5); > > + ok &= test_image_faults (PIXMAN_a8, 7, 5); > > + ok &= test_image_faults (PIXMAN_a4, 7, 5); > > + ok &= test_image_faults (PIXMAN_a1, 7, 5); > > Maybe there's a case for checking that the addresses just the other side > of the boundaries *don't* cause segfaults, in addition to checking that > these ones *do*? Yup, will add. Thanks, pq _______________________________________________ Pixman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman
