On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 17:21:16 +0100 "Nemanja Lukic" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi YunQiang Su, > > Attached is solution for unwanted symbol visibility. > I'll upstream both patches soon. > diff --git a/pixman/pixman-mips-dspr2-asm.h b/pixman/pixman-mips-dspr2-asm.h > index cab122d..718737e 100644 > --- a/pixman/pixman-mips-dspr2-asm.h > +++ b/pixman/pixman-mips-dspr2-asm.h > @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ > */ > #define LEAF_MIPS32R2(symbol) \ > .globl symbol; \ > + .hidden symbol; \ > .align 2; \ > .type symbol, @function; \ > .ent symbol, 0; \ >From "info as": 7.59 `.hidden NAMES' ==================== This is one of the ELF visibility directives. The other two are `.internal' (*note `.internal': Internal.) and `.protected' (*note `.protected': Protected.). This directive overrides the named symbols default visibility (which is set by their binding: local, global or weak). The directive sets the visibility to `hidden' which means that the symbols are not visible to other components. Such symbols are always considered to be `protected' as well. This is an ELF-specific directive. ARM assembly code encloses this directive in "#ifdef __ELF__" to be on a safe side. Are there any possible MIPS targets using non-ELF object file format? -- Best regards, Siarhei Siamashka _______________________________________________ Pixman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman
