On Fri, 11 Jan 2013, Siarhei Siamashka <[email protected]> wrote:
The "t-firefox-chalkboard" test seems to have regressed a bit. Is it a random noise in the measurements? Or one of the optimizations is poorly performing here?
Yes, that was by far the most noticeable regression, although by much less than most of the improvements in other tests. My best guess is that it was hitting the same problem as the L1 lowlevel-blt-bench tests for the blit operations. I've been doing a bit of work on that (and fixing a couple of bugs that also lead to additional performance improvements) over the last few days, so I hope that when I next run the cairo benchmarks this may improve. If so, I will probably post a supplementary patch sooner rather than later. Ben _______________________________________________ Pixman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman
