Siarhei Siamashka <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Siarhei Siamashka > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Nemanja Lukic <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Is this small improvement worth making this code vulnerable to endian >>> issues? >> >> If you are already satisfied with this level of performance, then it's >> probably fine for now. > > By the way, I really mean it :) In my opinion, it is generally enough > that the patches are useful for something and do not cause > regressions. If implementing additional performance tweaks may take > too much time, then they can be added later. But it is also important > to realize that there is still some room for improvement and not to > drop the optimization work half-way. > > Also maybe you have noticed that pixman-0.26.0 is about to be released > next week: > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pixman/2012-May/001969.html > We still need to either fix the bug which causes the test suite > failure for MIPS DSP ASE. Or at least disable problematic > optimizations for this stable release.
Yeah, unless someone who understands the fix here: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pixman/2012-May/001932.html comes up with a commit message, I'll just revert the optimization before releasing. Søren _______________________________________________ Pixman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman
