On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Søren Sandmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Matt Turner <[email protected]> writes: > >>> Are there any interesting chips without MMX extensions? Pentium MMX >>> definitely is not interesting. If there aren't, I'd rather just get rid >>> of the ifdefs and unconditionally require MMX-ext to be present. >> >> Not really, but it doesn't seem to be much code at all to support >> MMX/nonEXT. Either way is okay with me. > > Then let's delete it. I prefer not having code around that nobody will > actually run.
Ack. Want me to resend the patches, or just make the changes before I commit? _______________________________________________ Pixman mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman
