On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Mark Janes <[email protected]> wrote: > EXT_timer_query and ARB_timer_query tests fail intermittently, causing > confusion for developers running quick.py to find regressions. These > tests have always been intermittent, and people generally know to > ignore them when they fail. > > However, if everyone ignores a test, there is no point in running it > all the time.
FWIW, on nv50 and nvc0, EXT_timer_query time-elapsed and ARB_timer_query query GL_TIMESTAMP reliably fail, and the rest reliably pass. I don't remember ever seeing inconsistent behaviour. FWIW I don't really know what these extensions do, or what the tests check for, but just thought I'd provide the data point. > --- > tests/quick.py | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tests/quick.py b/tests/quick.py > index 8762d7d..0856f75 100644 > --- a/tests/quick.py > +++ b/tests/quick.py > @@ -12,3 +12,5 @@ del profile.tests['shaders']['glsl-fs-inline-explosion'] > del profile.tests['shaders']['glsl-fs-unroll-explosion'] > del profile.tests['shaders']['glsl-vs-inline-explosion'] > del profile.tests['shaders']['glsl-vs-unroll-explosion'] > +del profile.tests['spec']['EXT_timer_query'] > +del profile.tests['spec']['ARB_timer_query'] > -- > 2.1.3 > > _______________________________________________ > Piglit mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit _______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
