On Friday, February 07, 2014 09:42:05 PM Ilia Mirkin wrote: > This makes it possible to run the summary on e.g. compressed files or > otherwise piped in with the <( ... ) shell construct. > > There should be no difference between open() on a path before and after > the realpath call. > > Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <[email protected]> > --- > framework/core.py | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/framework/core.py b/framework/core.py > index 45eea12..6a122f5 100644 > --- a/framework/core.py > +++ b/framework/core.py > @@ -647,8 +647,6 @@ def load_results(filename): > "main" > > """ > - filename = os.path.realpath(filename) > - > try: > with open(filename, 'r') as resultsfile: > testrun = TestrunResult(resultsfile)
I know that some people install piglit and add it's programs to their $PATH, is this going to break any of those use cases? It didn't seem to when I tested it, but some of those people might want to weigh in.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
