Hi Kashyap,
> Does this look like a reasonable way to create the "create-adder" function?
>
> (de create-adder Args
> (let
> (N (car Args)
> Adder (intern (pack "add-" N))
> P
> (list
> 'de
> Adder
> '(X)
> (list '+ N 'X) ) )
> (eval P) ) )
>
> : (create-adder 10)
> -> add-10
> : (add-10 20)
> -> 30
Yes, but you can do it a little simpler by directly calling 'def':
(de create-adder (N)
(def (intern (pack "add-" N))
(list '(X) (list '+ N 'X)) ) )
Note also that I use (N), i.e. an evaluated argument, as this makes the function
more general.
Even simpler if you use 'curry':
(de create-adder (@N)
(def (intern (pack "add-" @N))
(curry (@N) (X)
(+ @N X) ) ) )
It is especially simpler if the function body, which is here just (+ N X), is
more complicated, because then the 'list'ing and 'cons'ing of the body would
become very unreadable.
> If I understand correctly, the "macro" capability of miniPicoLisp is not at
> par with PicoLisp right?
The 'macro' function of mini and normal PicoLisp is the same I think.
☺/ A!ex
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe
