Hi Alex, > Yes, but the point is not the text, but the interaction with it.
Understood. That's why a demo of such kind is still needed :) > In fact, it was created as a parody of Wittgenstein, not as a serious tool to > explain or teach PicoLisp. A nice exercise would be to replace the current text > with that of the old Tractatus logico-philosophicus :) My idea was indeed to replace the current contents with something else. Tractatus logico-philosophicus is a great suggestion (mind you, I didn'read it yet ... :) > > - explicit mention of being created with PicoLisp >> Yes, that's why the link to the source is there. Maybe it should be a bit more explicit, with a header stating explicitly: "Demo of PicoLisp dynamically generated HTML" or something like that. > > - more stand-alone example (in the same sense as your geneology demo) > Is it not stand-alone? It runs as Babel :) I mean that the example contents better shouldn't be related to PicoLisp. Currently people could have the idea that these are the main docs on PicoLisp, which is not good I think. As you earlier suggested Tractatus logico-philosophicus would be a nice replacement > > would be better appreciated I think ... > Correct. This was the purpose (demo of Pil). OK. > What would you suggest how do it? Well, I intend to first complete PLEAC. After that I'd really like to: - update the Wiki front page a bit (in the spirit of Tractatus Blaesicus), which preserves it and probably makes it more visible - try my hand at the replacement of TB (with a bit of help maybe) - create standardized Wiki docs for Library References - rework my extra sample page a bit Would you agree? Thx! Arie
