Yes persistant connections to pg make a LOT of difference and are recommended.. I have never had overhead problems using them eaither. I am terribly sorry i didn't mention this before.
Just make sure you have proper indexes and you should be good to go. regards, dan Uros Gruber wrote: >Hi! > >I make some more test for this. > >When i enable pconect (persistant) the result amazed me. > >PGSQL >Total time: 0.0070 >Execution time: 0.0034 >MySQL >Total time: 0.0072 >Execution time: 0.0027 > >Now PGSQL is as fast as mysql or maybe a littttttttle slower. >So is this normal that non-persistant is so much overhead for >pg. Is there any tools to check this. Or is some kind of a >bug in php. I use 4.2.3. And pg is 7.2.1. Can somebody make >some test. I can send script what i've run. > > > > -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
