On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 18:34, Justin French wrote:
> on 06/04/02 11:05 AM, Maxim Maletsky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> 
> > You're deadly wrong, Justin. Years of coding and I have never seen this
> > behavior of nl2br(). Perhaps I missed its new behavior's introduction
> > (guilty as charged if so) but I only remember it returning me <BR> not
> > <BR>. I have several regex depending on it.

'Deadly' wrong? Wow.

> Well, I've been at this PHP thing for 2 years, and like I said, "for as long
> as *I* can remember, it's been <BR />".  Perhaps it was introduced in PHP4,
> perhaps earlier.  I was not an in depth user of PHP3.

Justin is right on this one. This was changed on Dec 27, 2000. So it's 
been around for quite a long time.

It was added because it's valid XML *and* valid HTML. It is true that 
some browsers will not correctly interpret <br/> (note the lack of a 
space before the /) but everything I've ever tested has been just fine
with <br />. As they should.

This has been discussed a zillion times on the mailing lists. Maxim, you
could have found lots of background on the change by searching the list
archives (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com) the bug database 
(http://bugs.php.net) and the CVS repository (http://cvs.php.net). Some
links which may explain things a bit better:

A thread on the topic:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-dev&m=99321596031773&w=2

The CVS entry itself:
http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/php4/ext/standard/string.c?r1=1.176&r2=1.177


Torben
 
> But I can't be "deadly wrong" :)
> 
> 
> > False!
> > 
> > It DOES NOT work fine in every browser. I'd love to give you a prov, but
> > because I am lazy I will just tell you this formula:
> > 
> > 
> > if("I found this issue"=="I noticed screwed pages on my site") {
> > All I did: preg_replace("<BR[^>]*>", "<BR>", $text); {
> > ...and pages became pretty again.
> > }
> > }
> > 
> > /// preg 'couse I had no idea what comes up next :-)
> 
> Again.  I was only stating MY experience.  "Every browser I can get my hands
> on".  I do extensive testing, and have never seen a <BR> or <BR/> or <BR />
> misbehave.
> 
> If you have seen it perform unexpectedly, I'm keen to hear about.
> 
> 
> In fact, if this is the case, then I'll be writing my own nl2br function
> which returns a <br>, to avoid this problem ever again.
> 
> 
> Perhaps in future releases, nl2br() should have an option flag for switching
> between XHTML and HTML?  I can't see why the powers that be would have
> included XHTML compliance if it wasn't backwards compatible.
> 
> 
> 
> > when was it changed? Is there any reference?
> 
> I went to php.net/nl2br and this line of text was in there:
> 
> "Note: Starting with PHP 4.0.5, nl2br() is now XHTML compliant. All versions
> before 4.0.5 will return string with '<br>' inserted before newlines instead
> of '<br />'."
> 
> :)
> 
> So it would appear that I've only been using nl2br since I got my hands on
> PHP4.05+, which according to the earliest date I can find, was released
> sometime around 2001-04-30.
> 
> 
> 
> Justin French
> --------------------
> Creative Director
> http://Indent.com.au
> --------------------
> 
> 
> -- 
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> 
-- 
 Torben Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 http://www.thebuttlesschaps.com
 http://www.hybrid17.com
 http://www.inflatableeye.com
 +1.604.709.0506


-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to