So, we can say that on scripts that accomplish absolutely nothing, jsp
is faster than php - I can live with that :) Most of my scripts do
accomplish something (intended or not!) ;)
Tim wrote:
> Actually, an optimizing Java compiler would have detected it was a "dead
> loop" (i.e. didn't actually do anything) and just skipped it, meaning it
> took four seconds just to load the JSP page and invoke the bean. :) :)
>
> The only benchmarks that mean anything are your actual web applications
> running on your actual servers...anything else is only speculation.
>
> - Tim
> http://www.phptemplates.org
>
>
> On Sun, 2001-09-02 at 15:08, Mark Charette wrote:
>
>>And, of course, the JSP was running 20000 x 20000 iterations, or 400,000,000
>>iterations, in a few seconds.
>>
>>Yeah, right.
>>
>
>
>
--
_______ ___ _ ____ _____
Chris Hobbs / ____\ \ / / | | |/ ___\| __ \
Head Geek | (___ \ \ / /| | | | (___ | | | |
WebMaster \___ \ \ \/ / | | | |\___ \| | | |
PostMaster ____) | \ / | |__| |____) | |__| |
\____/ \/ \____/ \____/|_____/
http://www.silvervalley.k12.ca.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
