On May 10, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Micky Hulse wrote:
> [OT]
>
> Thanks for the informative reply Tedd.
>
> I respect your opinion and I don't think my approach is more right
> than yours. I am wondering if this is just a DTD thing. I always use
> an HTML 4.01 strict DTD and have not used an XHTML doctype in ages.
>
> As far as I can tell, the specs in XHTML say "not recommended", but I
> can't find similar text in HTML 4.01 specs.
>
> <b>Jenkins</b> vs. <span class="baz">Jenkins</span>
>
> ... to me, the latter seems to be overkill.
>
> <b class="baz">Jenkins</b>
>
> I can't of many times I have done the above... If I need to hook into
> the <b> or <i> I might just do this (for example):
>
> <div id="wrapper">Bob <b>Jenkins</b></div>
>
> #wrapper b { do whatever here }
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 7:41 AM, tedd <[email protected]> wrote:
>> As for me, I choose to never use <b> and <i> for anything PERIOD and to
>> speak out against their use whenever I can. As for <table> in presentation,
>> judgment, the <b> and <i> tags present more problems than they solve so I
>> will continue to not use those tags and speak against them.
>
> Looking at your site:
>
> http://sperling.com/
>
> Viewing the source code on your homepage, I see <b> used 15 times in
> the body copy.
>
> I am assuming that maybe you have no control over that portion of your
> site due to the CMS you are using?
>
> Could you imagine using <strong> in all those instances where you used
> <b>? Don't you think that would be overkill?
>
> Sorry to everyone for taking this so OT for the PHP list.
>
> [/OT]
>
> Micky
Unless he is specifically saying to use .php extensions for url's I doubt it's
a CMS.
Regards,
-Josh
____________________________________
Joshua Kehn | [email protected]
http://joshuakehn.com
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
