On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 17:22, Jerry Schwartz <je...@gii.co.jp> wrote: > I think the canonical way would be to have one table for your items, one table > for your tags, and one table for your tag assignments. >
Thank you, I do agree that this is the best way. Other posters seem to agree as well! > Using an ever-lengthening bitmap for the tag assignments is a trap for the > unwary. The path to perdition is lined with the bodies of those who believed > "We'll never need more than x..." > 640 kb? > As for setting up a hierarchy, that's trickier. One way to handle that is to > work like libraries do: 10 is "fiction", 10.05 is "crime novels", 10.05.07 is > "British authors", and so forth. Your `tags` table then looks like > Thanks. I prefer the "parent tag" field, though, I feel that it is more flexible. -- Dotan Cohen http://gibberish.co.il http://what-is-what.com -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
