On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 14:53 -0400, Daniel Brown wrote: > On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Ashley Sheridan > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Unless it's a JPEG 2000 (which isn't web-safe) then it's lossy, even at > > 100% quality. The nature of the algorithm is such that there is always > > loss involved, which is why it's best to work on photos that are not in > > JPEG format, as each save and re-open creates more and more distortion > > (although not much that will be noticed in a photo!) > > Hey, you kids get this off-topic discussion off my lawn! > > How many times do I have to remind you that this is a *PHP* list? > Don't I do well enough leading by example by never posting non-PHP > stuff to this list? > > Good God....
BTW, to point out the obvious hypocrisy... you write this after starting that huge off-topic discussion yesterday about some guy named Robert Cummings and his new baby. Sheeeeeesh!! Get off my world! ;) Cheers, Rob. -- http://www.interjinn.com Application and Templating Framework for PHP -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
