it's the most flexible and fastest to query.

Mmm, that's debateable. Not knowing the ins and outs of MySQL I'd hazard a guess that reading an extra 255 bytes from the table file might be faster in some circumstances than opening two extra table files. And I don't see why it's more flexible...?

The latter two solutions I suggested are certainly easier to work with and (with todays hardware), speed isn't always a factor.

--
Richard Heyes

+----------------------------------------+
| Access SSH with a Windows mapped drive |
|    http://www.phpguru.org/sftpdrive    |
+----------------------------------------+

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to