agreed :)

On 8/25/07, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2007-08-25 at 10:57 -0400, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> > Robert,
> >
> > C is a low-level language whereas php is a high level language.
> > ill admit it openly, i am biased toward oop / design patterns.
> > and i think what i boils down to is what you view as 'icing'
> > i view as 'bread-and-butter' ;)
>
> I've pulled Larry out of the CC list BTW :)
>
> I also prefer OOP when developing in PHP.
>
> > personally i shudder when i see a big pile of usntructured code, or
> > a bunch of functions that are loosly organized, if at all.  this
> constitues
> > most php applications i have seen in the industry of which i have
> > been participating for roughly 3 yaers now.
>
> Oh I'd have to agree. Many things I've downloaded and looked at make me
> want to gag. But, that's not a symptom of procedural code-- it's a
> symptom of poor coding design/skill/style/ethic.
>
> > look at C++, Java, and PHP.  these languages are all written in C;
> > they are high level, and although php allows you to write proceedrual
> > code, i think it is best used from an oop paradigm.
>
> That really depends. Just because we prefer to code in OOP in PHP, does
> not in anyway discount the merit of well written non OOP PHP code.
>
> Cheers,
> Rob.
> --
> ...........................................................
> SwarmBuy.com - http://www.swarmbuy.com
>
>     Leveraging the buying power of the masses!
> ...........................................................
>

Reply via email to