On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 16:01 +0100, Stut wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 09:52 -0500, Jay Blanchard wrote:
> >> Ignoring the extra $ and moving on... I would code it like this...
> >>
> >> function think(&$i)
> >> {
> >> $i = 'am';
> >> }
> >>
> >> If I call think, then I am thinking, therefore $i should become 'am'.
> >>
> >> If you return 'am' rather than changing $i IMHO you're deviating from
> >> the spec.
> >> [/snip]
> >>
> >> No sarcasm at all. And you are spot on!
> >
> > $i = $i == 'think' ? 'am' : 'am not';
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Rob.
>
> Again this is deviating from the spec. A more accurate version would be...
>
> $i = $i == 'think' ? 'am' : $i;
>
> The spec doesn't say what $i becomes if it's not think.
Then you can't even assume it's $i ;)
Cheers,
Rob.
--
.------------------------------------------------------------.
| InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com |
:------------------------------------------------------------:
| An application and templating framework for PHP. Boasting |
| a powerful, scalable system for accessing system services |
| such as forms, properties, sessions, and caches. InterJinn |
| also provides an extremely flexible architecture for |
| creating re-usable components quickly and easily. |
`------------------------------------------------------------'
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
