On 3/23/07, Mario Guenterberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 12:24:45AM -0500, Travis Doherty wrote:
> After multiple runs I see that the for pre-increment loop is fastest.
> Note that the while loop with a post-increment runs once more than with
> a pre-increment.
>
> Everytime I run, the results are *very* different, though still fall
> within similar comparitive domains.
Hi...
I used your script and my results are different from yours.
The post-while increment is generally the fastest result on my
machine (Core 2 Duo, php 5.2.1 and apache 2.2.4).
I ran the script multiple times:
[schnipp ]
For pre-increment (100000): 0.066
For post-increment (100000): 0.066
While pre-increment (100000): 0.028
While post-increment (100001): 0.025
[schnipp ]
Greetings
Mario
Well, myh results are a little bit confusing again, if using
pre-increment, for shows up faster now. But while post-increment is
the fastest :) Is there any logic why we all have different results?
does it has to do something with the type of CPU, i'm using AMD
Athlon. 1800+ (clocked down from 133 to 100 * 11.5)
For pre-increment (100000): 0.026
For post-increment (100000): 0.030
While pre-increment (100000): 0.029
While post-increment (100001): 0.023
Tijnema
ps. @ Mario: Youre C2D got owned by a AMD 1.15Ghz :)
--
-----------------------------------------------------
| havelsoft.com - Ihr Service Partner für Open Source |
| Tel: 033876-21 966 |
| Notruf: 0173-277 33 60 |
| http://www.havelsoft.com |
| |
| Inhaber: Mario Günterberg |
| Mützlitzer Strasse 19 |
| 14715 Märkisch Luch |
-----------------------------------------------------
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
