I obviously agree with you. But more importantly I am concerned that none of those concerns were properly addressed.
More importantly Larry Garfield made a very good point <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/php-fig/vZOpga3xoLg/_Q-CbeWMAQAJ> saying that the survey was biased. And I have not see that addressed properly. Let me quote him, because I feel it's important: 4.4: > * The description here of the vote, IIRC, is rather misleading. It wasn't > a > "do you like this", but a "do you have a really really good reason to not > do > it the way we've already written?" That's why the votes are so > dramatically > biased in favor of the status quo: The survey specifically said to bias > that > direction. The survey should be accurately described or omitted. As is, > it > is misleading and false. I am afraid that we are making a standard that is supposed to be a long-term commitment based on very short-sighted views ("I don't want to edit my existing code, so let's standardize whatever it is that I am doing"). My pull-request was rejected <https://github.com/php-fig/fig-standards/pull/992#issuecomment-363367902> with what feels a bit like "we'd rather have a half-assed spec than be late". I don't want to discard the entire survey, but I can't help feeling that it would need more discussions, and compromises, to reach a coherent and simple spec. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/9c865c4f-33d3-4ed1-ac6e-7bd19d9df743%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
