Hello, You can temporarily find the list here: > > https://github.com/stefanotorresi/fig-standards/blob/5804f440faf78cde4b0c21b6bcd2cee64cf04778/personnel.md > > <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fstefanotorresi%2Ffig-standards%2Fblob%2F5804f440faf78cde4b0c21b6bcd2cee64cf04778%2Fpersonnel.md&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNH3g_dxdUh7RZVEncn-Tn1zGTo-Qg>
Thanks Stefano for the list. It is better to specify a generic interface and then your saft framework > implements a compatible rdf adapter implementing that interface, a bridge > pattern (double dragon adapter interface). Could you please describe in more detail what you mean with a "generic interface"? I assume you mean something like a "specification" of, for example, an array-based structure? To me RDF just looks like more XML with an rdf: namespace. I dislike XML > because it isn't human friendly, duplicates alot of semantics that could be > inherited and has such extensive and complex (might be more accurate to say > horribly written out) specifications that open source tools are too buggy > or require corporate funding to develop and release something complete.. > meaning the poor people will just invent something simple with common sense > that kicks its teeth in or leave a trail of complete tools for sections of > the spec. I would like to address your opinion. RDF has multiple forms of serialization, for instance RDF/XML, but could be way more human friendly if it is serialized as RDF/Turtle [2], for instance. RDF itself describes a very basic data model, everything is structured as subject, predicate and object. Further information about the data model, for instance data types, are part of the data itself and not separate, like in RDBs. This data model has multiple strengths, for instance simplicity and consistence. Fun fact: RDF is part of Linked Data [3] and is considered the level of data, by Tim Berners Lee [4]. From my point of view, RDF makes it very easy to interchange data, for instance. Another strength is the consistent to query such data, using SPARQL[5]. No matter how your data look or what data structures you use, with SPARQL you have a unified way to query data. Enough of the RDF-advertising :) Hope it helped. Regards Konrad [1] - https://github.com/php-fig/fig-standards/pull/958#issuecomment-345666199 [2] - https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turtle_(Syntax) [3] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linked_data [4] - http://5stardata.info/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/54e2c9fe-49f3-4bf5-a45e-fe37e0569839%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
