> Having said that, if someone wants to do the research and come up with an actual count of which member projects use an Interface suffix, and which do not, I'd be open to modifying my stand depending on the results.
This argument is weak. Majority can be wrong. On Wednesday, August 17, 2016 at 6:02:04 PM UTC+3, pmjones wrote: > > > > On Aug 15, 2016, at 14:53, Matthieu Napoli <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > > > > Please share your reasons to vote FOR or AGAINST the change, let's > debate for 2 weeks or more, and then let's have a vote to settle this. > > "Against" (i.e., leave the Interface suffix in place.) > > My impression is that the majority of member projects use the Interface > suffix. Since we should generally be basing decisions on what the member > projects themselves do, that's enough reason right there. > > Further, since the suffix is already ensconced in a PSR, changing it now > would put the two out-of-sync with each other, driving many future > conversations about why it's OK in that PSR but not in others. > > Having said that, if someone wants to do the research and come up with an > actual count of which member projects use an Interface suffix, and which do > not, I'd be open to modifying my stand depending on the results. > > > -- > > Paul M. Jones > http://paul-m-jones.com > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP Framework Interoperability Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/php-fig/5df31985-b3ec-4298-9627-e0beb39725a2%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
