ID:               37149
 Updated by:       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reported By:      troelskn at gmail dot com
-Status:           Open
+Status:           Bogus
 Bug Type:         Feature/Change Request
 Operating System: *
 PHP Version:      *
 Assigned To:      helly
 New Comment:

Thank you for taking the time to write to us, but this is not
a bug. Please double-check the documentation available at
http://www.php.net/manual/ and the instructions on how to report
a bug at http://bugs.php.net/how-to-report.php

doesn't matter, you still cannot use it in array functions


Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2006-04-20 18:43:08] troelskn at gmail dot com

I has the interface of an array. Thus, in a logical sense it _is_ an
array.

Changed the category to "Feature/Change Request".

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2006-04-20 18:18:30] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank you for taking the time to write to us, but this is not
a bug. Please double-check the documentation available at
http://www.php.net/manual/ and the instructions on how to report
a bug at http://bugs.php.net/how-to-report.php

it is an object not an array, use "instanceof ArrayAccess"

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2006-04-20 16:14:44] troelskn at gmail dot com

Description:
------------
Using is_array() on an instance of ArrayObject returns FALSE. While
strictly speaking this is true, it would make sense to return TRUE in
most application-level code.

Expected result:
----------------
A solution could be to add an argument to is_array, which relaxes the
check to include ArrayObject. Eg. :

bool is_array ( mixed var, [bool strict] )

$obj = new ArrayObject();
is_array($obj, FALSE); // returns TRUE
is_array($obj); // returns FALSE



------------------------------------------------------------------------


-- 
Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=37149&edit=1

Reply via email to