Edit report at http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=47494&edit=1

 ID:                 47494
 Comment by:         larry at garfieldtech dot com
 Reported by:        philipp dot feigl at gmail dot com
 Summary:            htmlspecialchars does not throw E_WARNING on
                     multibyte problems
 Status:             Bogus
 Type:               Bug
 Package:            Strings related
 Operating System:   CentOS5
 PHP Version:        5.2.8
 Block user comment: N
 Private report:     N

 New Comment:

This bug should be reopened, not just documented.  Haven't we learned
our lesson with magic_quotes and its ilk?  Designing PHP to try and save
the user when the user does something stupid always backfires.  Always. 
MySQL has the same problem, and it backfires there, too.



The current logic is simply backward.  "When display_errors is on, you
get all errors except from this function.  When display_errors is off,
you get no errors except from this one function."  There is no logical
reason for that.



I'm working on a project that has been stalled for over a week while we
try to figure out what's wrong with the character encoding configuration
on our production server, only to realize that the data is (probably)
bad but we didn't know it because of this bug.



This is a bug and should be fixed, not simply documented as dumb.



If a production server is misconfigured, that's not the job of the
language to fix.  All that does is, as another commenter noted, punish
those who configure their servers properly.  If anything, it is a
security hole for people who DO configure their server properly by
turning off display_errors, as then these strings would get echoed in
production.  How is that helpful to anyone?


Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2011-05-03 17:48:02] pinkgothic at gmail dot com

Could this bug please get REOPENED as a documentation bug

then? As already stated, the absence of the information in

the documentation can be crippling for people who do things

-right-. (Admittedly right now "htmlspecialchars" has my

comment on the subject, but that's hardly official...)



(Sidenote: You might also want to close Bug #54109 as bogus

for consistency.)

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2011-05-03 17:33:35] ras...@php.net

This isn't a logic error. The idea is to prevent a user-triggered
information 

leak by not showing this error to the user in case a production server
is 

misconfigured and running with display_errors turned on.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2011-05-02 14:48:50] example at example dot com

Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too!
Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too!
Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too!
Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too!
Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too!
Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too! Me too!

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2011-03-10 18:05:11] dtajchre...@php.net

I say this is a logic error. Bugs #54109 and #52397 also mention the
same 

behavior in two other spots of code. 

php_error_docref already handles display_errors configurations... I
don't how 

this would be considered correct/intended 

behavior.. 



Questionable logic: http://svn.php.net/viewvc/php/php-

src/branches/PHP_5_3/ext/standard/html.c?view=markup#l1145



if(!PG(display_errors)) { 

        php_error_docref(NULL TSRMLS_CC, E_WARNING, "Invalid multibyte sequence


in argument");

}

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2011-03-10 17:37:31] pinkgothic at gmail dot com

I'm afraid this isn't just confusing, but actually punishes people who
do it right by blindsiding them completely.



Scenario:



 * display_errors off

 * an Exception-throwing error handler



As far as I'm informed, this is good practise. (I acknowledge I may be
misinformed.)



However, due to this behaviour, you suddenly get application crashes in
production without that anyone really 

understands why the code snippet is suddenly a culprit. 'But we tested
it with broken UTF-8, why are -we- just 

getting empty strings? And the documentation says that's what we should
be expecting...'



> If a configuration variable tells that errors are shown on screen then
I

> think all errors (dependent on reporting level) are shown - and not
that

> they can be only logged if the configuration variable is turned off.

> I think/hope this is not only my opinion.



Yeah, you're not alone; but live and learn, I guess? :)



> For debugging, I would suggest always logging errors and checking the

> error log, as some errors may be hard to spot in display anyway

> (especially true if your script produces something like JSON).



Well, from my experience, people who deliberately turn display_errors on
for development except their feedback in 

the browser window [*unless* they are writing for XHR], not in a log
they may also be running in parallel.



This is especially true if you have a complex application that logs
debug information from several services into one 

file in a compact format - so, unless you're LOOKING for an error, you
won't spot anything. (Total sidenote, I 

honestly wish I could change the log format I have to suffer... but I'm
stuck with it. Gargh.)



If you've been a good developer and read the manual on
htmlspecialchars(), you're not going to expect an error. 

You're going to expect an empty string. Unfortunately currently, nothing
in the documentation reveals that the 

function results in an E_WARNING, either pure-log-only when
display_errors is on, or log and trigger_error()ed when 

display_errors is off.



By the time you find this closed php bug... well, if you're lucky,
you've forced your developers to have a wrapper 

function you can now add a try-catch to - otherwise you can now do a
project-wide search for every call of the 

function. [To be fair, I was fortunately lucky.]



Could this bug please get REOPENED as a documentation bug? I think
adding this behaviour to the documentation would 

help a lot of people confused by it.

------------------------------------------------------------------------


The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view
the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at

    http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=47494


-- 
Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=47494&edit=1

Reply via email to