Edit report at http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=50373&edit=1
ID: 50373 Updated by: paj...@php.net Reported by: rugkiks at gmail dot com -Summary: GD: imagepng doesn't doesn't have lockflags +Summary: GD: image* should work with stream handles Status: Assigned Type: Feature/Change Request -Package: Feature/Change Request +Package: *General Issues Operating System: GNU/Linux PHP Version: 5.3.1 Assigned To: pajoye New Comment: Update the summary to reflect the necessary change, which is not about adding a locking mechanism in gd. Previous Comments: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2009-12-04 00:34:08] rugkiks at gmail dot com Yes, it isn't a big deal, and not breaking my workflow. But i believe file-locking is there for a reason, and is a neat feature making my code cleaner :). Tons of programs solve this by having .lock files, so i guess this is also an understandable code. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2009-12-04 00:18:27] ras...@php.net I still don't think it is a big deal. Just create a filename.lck file and lock that while the image is being generated if you need that feature. It is perhaps 2 extra lines of code. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2009-12-04 00:02:20] paj...@php.net Let see if we can get something non intrusive without adding yet another option to this function (already confusing :). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2009-12-03 23:55:39] rugkiks at gmail dot com It's the blocking feature i'm after. When the image is updating, other fopen's needs to get blocked. It makes my code much more simpler. Also, you can do this with ImageMagick, since it allows you to supply the file handle yourself http://php.net/imagick_writeimagefile The only reason why i'm requesting this feature to GD, is because of GD's speed. rasmus: The renaming-method is nice. But in my case, i need the users to be blocked until the image is ready. Not just show the old one, or return a 404. I can program my way out of it, but it's messy. I guess i'm saying that it would be nice with a http://php.net/imagick_writeimagefile for GD. Thank you for the response. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2009-12-03 20:25:58] paj...@php.net Same here, I don't see how we could do that for every simple file related functions. Please follow Rasmus' advice here, best possible solution. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=50373 -- Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=50373&edit=1