Ok I'll do that, thanks a lot! On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 at 18:45, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
> Igor ALBUQUERQUE SILVA <[email protected]> writes: > > Thanks a lot for the explanation, I thought the built-in types were more > > standard, so I didn't mention that I was having the same thing using > > postgis. > > Hm --- you'd have to take that up with the PostGIS people. But they > at least would be likely to have motivation to improve things. > > regards, tom lane >
