On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 7:06 AM Peter Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > 8. > There needs to be additional tests to confirm that the syntax has the > same flexibility as TABLE inclusion lists do > > e.g. all these variations below are valid and equivalent: > ... EXCEPT (TABLE t1, t2, t3, t4); > ... EXCEPT (TABLE t1, t2, TABLE t3, t4); > ... EXCEPT (TABLE t1, t2, TABLE t3, t4); > ... EXCEPT (TABLE t1, TABLE t2, TABLE t3, TABLE t4); >
>From all of the above, test with any one variant is okay. Let's not add tests unless they test some different variant of syntax. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
