Hi Carlos On 26/03/2026 18:59, Carlos Alves wrote: > No errors or failures were detected during the tests. > > The only suggestion is to keep the parameter description a single paragraph, > following the same style as the description of the other inclusion > parameters. But the current description is coherent and okay. > > After the tests, the patch is working as expected: > - Table-level comments are copied when the `including comments` parameter is > used. > - When there is more than one source table, comments, if any, are kept in the > order in which they appear in the command, separated by a new line. > - The performance of command execution was not affected. > > I think only the code review is missing, but I don't have much experience to > perform this step.
Thanks for this thorough review. This helps a lot! Let's see what the other reviewers have to say about the code and your docs suggestion. Best, Jim
