That sounds good to me.That sounds good to me.On Thu, 26 Mar 2026 16:22:07 +0700 John Naylor <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 11:15 AM Yugo Nagata <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 25 Mar 2026 08:24:40 +0700 > > John Naylor <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I'm ambivalent about this. Instead of trying to document all the > > > possible valid possibilities (which may get out of date again), maybe > > > we can say that it's not allowed on a single column? > > > > Thank you for the suggestion. I agree that this is a simpler approach, > > so I've attached a revised patch. > > - errmsg("extended statistics require at least 2 columns"))); > + errmsg("extended statistics are not supported on a single column"))); > > I'd probably write this as "extended statistics on a single column are > not supported" (no need to send a new patch). > > Any objections? That sounds good to me. > Also, I'm leaning towards not backpatching -- I figure a user that got > here by fat-fingering an expression is not likely to be too confused. +1 Regards, Yugo Nagata > I looked in the feature thread and saw that this was actually raised > during development of the feature: > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAEZATCU9uPo7JYdx4k0-ufXXZH8t7itodibUwCva%2Bs%2BAvAKcnw%40mail.gmail.com > > -- > John Naylor > Amazon Web Services -- Yugo Nagata <[email protected]>
